now browsing by tag


#cyberfraud | #cybercriminals | Department of Parliamentary Services gives itself cyber tick of approval

Source: National Cyber Security – Produced By Gregory Evans

Image: Asha Barbaschow/ZDNet

The Australian Department of Parliamentary Services (DPS) has self-assessed that everything is mostly fine with its infrastructure, following a leaked report that everything was not.

Last month, the ABC reported that an internal audit written by KPMG had given many elements of DPS the lowest cyber maturity rating possible.

At Senate Estimates on Monday morning, DPS secretary Rob Stefanik said the leaked report was a draft prepared after the advisory giant had completed its “preliminary field work”.

“It wasn’t until a process of validation and verification that a lot of the information presented in that draft was simply found to be incorrect and the final report that they had produced, which had an implementation plan in it, in July 2019, did not have the statements in it that the original draft did.”

Stefanik said that instead of receiving the “ad hoc” rating — the lowest possible rating on a scale that ranges from ad hoc to developing, to managing, to embedded as the highest rating — the department bagged a “managing” rating in 85 of 88 criteria, with the remaining three being scored as “developing”.

Labor Senator Kimberley Kitching asked to what extent the department was able to self-assess its cyber maturity.

“It’s entirely self-assessment,” Stefanik replied.

Senate President Scott Ryan said the final report would not be released, and senators could take their concerns to the private Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations, Staffing, and Security.

“It is not appropriate to release that report because it contains information that could be used to weaken our cybersecurity,” he said.

“We have more lengthy discussions on these matters in a non-public forum to which all senators are entitled to attend and, having consulted officials, both in the Department of the Senate and in DPS, it is the view that that committee, which has a specific mandate regarding information technology in its terms of reference, is the appropriate place to discuss matters that should not be drawn to public attention or exposed to public.”

In earlier remarks, Ryan said public sector networks were targeted across a four-day period in October.

“During this period, the investment that DPS made in cybersecurity has paid dividends,” Ryan said.

“Our cybersecurity operation centre was able to leverage information from partners to be well prepared in advance of the campaign, and protective controls in place, blocked many attempts to inject malware into the environment.”

The attackers also went after parliamentary staff on their personal email addresses in an attempt to gain access to the parliamentary network.

“I’m pleased to report that there was a high degree of co-operation by users during this period, combined with the maturing cybersecurity defences that have been put in place. They both ensured that the parliamentary environment was protected from this attack,” the Senate President said.

“This is one example of many cases on a daily basis where parliament is targeted by malicious actors.”

The parliamentary network and Australia’s political parties were not successfully defended during an attack in February 2019.

For eight days, the attacker described as a state actor was able to remain on the network.

“While I do not propose to discuss operational security matters in detail, I can state that a small number of users visited a legitimate external website that had been compromised,” Ryan said at the time.

“This caused malware to be injected into the Parliamentary Computing Network.”

The incident highlighted the awful password practices present with Australia’s parliament.

Related Coverage

Parliament House hack report reveals poor password practices

It took eight days to flush February’s cyber attackers from Australia’s parliamentary network. A procedure to authenticate staff asking to reset their boss’ passwords only came another week later.

Ransomware infection takes some police car laptops offline in Georgia

Ransomware infection impacted police car laptops for the Georgia State Patrol, Georgia Capitol Police, and the Georgia Motor Carrier Compliance Division.

Department of Parliamentary Services says February attack was ‘detected early’

The department admitted it has work to do on fighting external threats.

Australian government computing network reset following security ‘incident’

Department of Parliamentary Services says there is no evidence to suggest data has been taken or accessed, or that the incident is part of a plan to influence electoral processes.

Cybercriminals flooding the web with coronavirus-themed spam and malware (TechRepublic)

Hackers have expanded their exploitation of the outbreak fears with hundreds of scams and operations.

Source link

The post #cyberfraud | #cybercriminals | Department of Parliamentary Services gives itself cyber tick of approval appeared first on National Cyber Security.

View full post on National Cyber Security

#cybersecurity | #hackerspace | ISOC’s PIR Attempts (Succeeded) To Sell Itself & .ORG TLD To Equity Firm ‘Ethos Capital’

Source: National Cyber Security – Produced By Gregory Evans

It’s an astonishing state of affairs, when the Public Internet Registry (PIR) can sell itself, without clear oversight and scrutiny as the sole administrator of the .ORG TLD (efectively meaning the conveyance of ownership of the .ORG TLD) to a private equity firm… Read Jon Brodkins’ take at Ars Technica on this…

*** This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog from Infosecurity.US authored by Marc Handelman. Read the original post at:

Source link

The post #cybersecurity | #hackerspace |<p> ISOC’s PIR Attempts (Succeeded) To Sell Itself & .ORG TLD To Equity Firm ‘Ethos Capital’ <p> appeared first on National Cyber Security.

View full post on National Cyber Security

Godaddy Defends itself in RamshackleGlam Hacking case

We reported the day before that the owner of, Jordan Reid had accused GoDaddy of not helping her to get her hijacked website back. 

Reid’s website was hijacked two days before and was being auctioned on by someone going with the nickname of Bahbouh. She ultimately got her website back, but she lashed out at both HostMonster and GoDaddy for not being better prepared to handle such situations. GoDaddy maintains that there have been a number of misconceptions about how the process works. 

They highlight the fact that GoDaddy was not the “losing registrar” in this case. Instead, the losing registrar, a term used for the registrar that holds the domain name before being transferred, is FastDomain, HostMonster’s domain registrar. FastDomain could have asked GoDaddy to simply transfer the domain name back, but the company hasn’t made such a request.

 GoDaddy says it’s highly responsive to such requests, but it hasn’t received one for the domain from FastDomain. 

Furthermore, if after five working days they don’t get a response, losing registrars can turn to the Transfer Emergency Action Contact (TEAC), a contact which each registrar must provide to ICANN. 

Registrars are required to respond to inquiries made through this channel within four hours, even if the final resolution takes a bit longer. Laurie Anderson, director of domain services at GoDaddy, told, “Every day, we receive reports domain names have been stolen.

 In order to protect our customers and other users of the Internet from having domain names maliciously taken, we have developed best practices,” “Part of these practices include verifying theidentity of the complainant. For increased security, we require multiple forms of identification and if we are unable to receive that data , we are unable to provide access to the domain,” Anderson added. “While this is no doubt a frustration for some people in some cases, it has saved countless domain names from being transferred incorrectly.”


The post Godaddy Defends itself in RamshackleGlam Hacking case appeared first on Am I Hacker Proof.

View full post on Am I Hacker Proof

When the protection scheme for the witness hacked itself

It has been claiming that the identities of the people, who were put into the witness protection, re disclosed to self-confessed phone hacker Glenn Mulcaire. After that the matter was known to everyone but the Scotland Yard took no action of it. Read More….

For more information go to, http://www., or

The post When the protection scheme for the witness hacked itself appeared first on National Cyber Security.

View full post on National Cyber Security

When the protection scheme for the witness hacked itself – National Cyber Security – Tata Group Chairman Emeritus Ratan Tata today met Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray at his residence in Mumbai. Sharmila, wife of Raj, was… #gregoryevans #HTCS #PSO #B4Inc In his…

View full post on Hi-Tech Crime Solutions Daily