now browsing by tag
WHETHER YOU wanted to fit in or stand out in high school—be the influenced or the influencer—adhering to social norms was key to navigating and surviving the experience. The same […] View full post on National Cyber Security
#minorsextrafficking | Ron Wyden, Section 230, and the fight to hold Big Tech accountable | #parenting | #parenting | #kids
Sen. Ron Wyden is ready to send the CEO of Facebook to prison, and he has the bill to do it. “When Mark Zuckerberg tells a whopper to the federal […] View full post on National Cyber Security
Kenya is set to become a major recipient of foreign direct investments in cloud computing.
This is as international investors rush to fund a data centre boom spawned by the proliferation of smartphones, mass adoption of business software and 5G.
Huawei, Microsoft and Amazon Web Services are some of the international players currently enticing small businesses with free data storage in preparation for a looming expansion in data fanned by 5G networks and fibre optic cables.
“So there’s a big opportunity there, as more people begin to use cloud services instead of having their own data servers. These are going to become more valuable,” said Xalam Analytics in their latest report on Africa data centre boom.
Another incentive for the localisation of data storage is that it improves internet speeds since users no longer have to fetch data from the other side of the world.
It is also being driven by clamours by government officials to have local data hosted domestically for national security purposes.
Banks such as Absa Kenya are making investments in machine learning and artificial intelligence tools to improve customer experience and credit risk. New “digital banks” such as Tala, Branch, Zenka are cloud-based.
Since cybersecurity is not an expert capability field for banks, continuous upgrading and development of data centres have been expensive.
Saccos have not been left behind either, as most of them are running on software that allows customers to access their services on the phone.
They also need to store this data somewhere given that in-house data centres are too costly for them. Governments are using cloud and virtualised infrastructure to enhance public service delivery.
Large retail firms also use computer capabilities such as Amazon Web Services databases to transform how they reach a predominantly mobile and digital customer base. Corporates whose expertise is not data storage are slowly giving up their small in-house data centres to major players – helping to drive demand while scores of cloud-native startups are leveraging the cloud to disrupt entire industry sectors.
“The fast-rising requirements of cloud-based technology businesses and their customers, as well as the search for the smallest possible delays in transaction times, has seen businesses seek alternative cloud options,” said the managing director, Carrier Services Division at Telkom Kenya Kebaso Mokogi.
The Kenyan market is currently served by Safaricom, Liquid Telecom, MTN business and other regional players who are set to face competition from the deep-pocketed multinationals who are able to outprice them.
However, Kenya alone does not have the market to attract such high profile investments but is acting as a Launchpad for regional business. It is, however, one of the most active in internet and tech-driven business hubs alongside South Africa and Nigeria.
Africa currently accounts for less than one per cent of total available global data centre capacity, according to data from Xalam Analytics, despite the continent being home to about 17 per cent of the world’s population.
However, its capacity has doubled in the past three years.
Xalam Analytics says the key players in Africa – South Africa, Kenya and Nigeria are set to see investments from multiple investors among them Warren Buffet backed Berkshire Partners and London-based private equity firm Actis, which is injecting Sh25 billion into African data centres over the next three years.
Actis is the investor behind Garden City Mall in Nairobi.
“If you look at the trends around data, its consumption, and cloud migration globally — those trends have played out in many markets and have led to significant growth of the data centre sector,” said Kabir Chal, director at Actis.
“Africa is no different: you see digitisation, the inexorable migration to cloud, and really the advent of big data but, as a consequence, the supply of data hasn’t kept up.”
For data-storage companies operating in Africa, a big hurdle is the continent’s lack of infrastructure, which complicates an already capital-intensive, power-hungry business.
Kenya’s power supply remains low at less than 2,000MW compared to South Africa’s 40,000MW. The two have nearly equal population size.
Companies must often rely on large-scale generators running on costly diesel and petrol to provide electricity, while slow internet speeds, high data costs and a lack of fibre networks constrain their operations.
Nevertheless, the Actis investment is part of a broader trend of international players looking to become involved in the data centre sector in sub-Saharan Africa — where the total data centre capacity equals about a quarter of London’s or half of Frankfurt’s, according to Xalam Analytics.
Microsoft also launched its first African cloud data centres last year, which is a key growth market alongside Nigeria, Kenya and Ghana.
It already accounts for roughly half of Africa’s data centre capacity. Meanwhile, Amazon Web Services plans to open a cluster of data centres in the coming months — the company’s first foray on the continent.
Do not miss out on the latest news. Join the Standard Digital Telegram channel HERE.
Xalam AnalyticsSafaricomGarden City MallMicrosoftHuawei
The post #deepweb | <p> Kenya’s data storage boom entices global tech giants : The Standard <p> appeared first on National Cyber Security.
View full post on National Cyber Security
biometrics, machine learning, privacy and being a woman in tech – Naked Security Podcast – Naked Security
To celebrate International Women’s Day we invite you to this all-female splinter episode. We discuss privacy, biometrics, machine learning, social media, getting into cybersecurity and, of course, what it’s like to be a woman in tech.
Host Anna Brading is joined by Sophos experts Hillary Sanders, Michelle Farenci and Alice Duckett.
View full post on National Cyber Security
#cybersecurity | #hackerspace | NEW TECH: CyCognito employs offensive bot network to put companies a step a head of attackers
When it comes to defending their networks, most companies have had it drilled into them, by now, that it’s essential to erect layered defenses.
Related:Promise vs. pitfalls of IoT
For small- and mid-sized businesses, firewalls, antivirus suites and access management systems represent the entry stakes for participating in today’s digital economy. Security-mature SMBs go the next step and embrace incidence response and disaster recovery planning, as well
Meanwhile, large enterprises pour tens of billions of dollars annually into next-gen firewalls, EDR, DLP and IDS technologies, each system generating a fire-hose of threat feeds, with all of this threat intel flooding, hour-by-hour, into SIEMs, UEBAs and other analytics platforms.
And yet, after a couple of decades of piling up layer upon layer of defenses, catastrophic breaches persist — they’re occurring as often as ever, and causing more harm than ever. Threat actors simply seek out the endless fresh attack vectors arising as an unintended consequence of digital transformation. In short, layered defenses have turned out to be cheesecloth.
Acknowledging this, a few cybersecurity innovators are taking a different tack. Instead of offering up more layers of defense, they’ve slipped on the shoes of the attackers and taken an offensive approach to defending IT assets. One of the most single-minded of these security vendors is startup CyCognito.
The company was launched in Tel Aviv in 2017 by a couple of former Israeli military cyber ops attack specialists, Rob Gurzeev and Dima Potekhin. Gurzeev and Potekhin set out to mirror the perspective of threat actors — and then help companies tactically leverage this attackers’ view to shore up their porous networks.
“The attackers need only to find a single blind spot to gain entry – it’s like singling out the weakest zebra in the herd,” says Gurzeev, CyCognito’s CEO. “Defenders, meanwhile, have to guard everything all of the time, and most organizations have many more Internet pathways than they even know about, much less are taking steps to defend.”
CyCognito’s employment of a bot network is what struck me most after I sat down with the team and learned in more detail what they’re up to. They’re not just borrowing a few pages from the attackers’ handbook; they’re actually utilizing the bad guys’ core tool – botnets They’ve set out to boldly redirect botnet-power towards helping, instead of exploiting, the good guys.
I first wrote about criminal botnets at USA TODAY in 2004. Botnets at the time were just emerging; they’ve since become entrenched as the engine that drives all of cybercrime. A bot is a computing nodule that strictly obeys instructions from a command and control server. A criminal botnet is a network of bots under control of an individual attacker.
Botnets are the nimble infrastructure that enables criminals to blast out massive ransomware and denial of service attacks and also to execute intricate advanced persistent threat (APT) hacks that play out over months and go very deep. Bots traditionally have arisen from compromised, or “pwned,” computing devices. Today bots are more often spun up as virtual instances of computing devices. Bad actors are spinning up these virtual bots by the million, utilizing computing resources sold, no questions asked, by the major cloud service providers, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud .
By contrast, CyCognito’s 60,000 nodule-strong bot network is comprised of computing instances distributed globally with the expressed intent to help enterprises protect themselves. Bots do what they’re told. CyCognito’s bot network actively crawls the Internet identifying and mapping all exposed IP assets, fingerprinting each asset. This is essentially identical to the ground-level crawling and probing reconnaissance tasks that criminal botnets perform every day.
Upon finding an exposed IT asset, say a web server or a gateway router, CyCognito can pinpoint the IP address, confirm what type of asset it is and check whether the asset has any open ports; it can even ferret out snippets of coding or text, such as a copyright, that indicates more granularly what specific functions the asset performs, who the asset belongs to and what other assets it communicates with.
CyCognito’s bots feed this ground-level intelligence back to an analytics platform, which makes correlations and may ask for more information. This results in an assessment of the business context surrounding each asset. “We’re building a live picture of what’s out there, not specifically looking for problems, at that stage,” explains Raphael Reich, CyCognito’s vice president of product marketing. “We’re collecting information to build associations between assets that other solutions miss: assets in the cloud, in subsidiaries, in third-party networks.”
Another thing about bots, they do what they’re told — for as long as they’re told to do it. Over the past couple of years, CyCognito’s botnet has surveilled and fingerprinted some 3.5 billion Internet-exposed IT assets, resulting in rich data sets that are fed into the company’s analytics. CyCognito has been able to map details of specific assets to thousands of organizations in much the way a criminal ring would do, which allows it to understand attackers’ easiest pathways i
Last November, the company released findings from an analysis it conducted to identify what it calls “shadow risk” – exposures that, for whatever reasons, enterprise IT and security teams are often blind to. Shadow risk creates attack vectors that are externally exposed to anyone with the skill and desire to go find them. The data reveals that a stunning percentage of organizations have a significant number of security blind spots, most often stemming from third-party and cloud interconnectivity. For instance, CyCognito’s research found:
•Organizations are unaware of as much as 75% of their attack surface.
•Some 82% of these hidden assets impact the organization’s cybersecurity posture and are managed by their cloud providers, partners or subsidiaries.
•Some 87% of organizations have critical exposures that are visible to attackers at a given point in time.
These findings are not at all surprising. Quite the opposite, they ring very true. Companies never found a way to stop intruders from breaching and plundering with impunity, even when all they had to defend were on-premises IT systems. Today we’re in the throes of digital transformation. Agility, speed, and modular transactions happen on the fly and in the cloud. This sets up a much more complex security challenge than setting up trip-wire alarms around an on-prem data center.
“Most organizations have expanded and broadly diversified their IT resources on-premises and in the cloud, making continuous monitoring and timely mitigation extremely challenging,” observes Potekhin, CyCognito’s CTO. “The inspiration for the CyCognito platform was the realization that the explosive growth in the numbers of threat actors and the sophistication of their tools has leapfrogged the capabilities of legacy security solutions and most of today’s enterprises, even those who are highly security-aware.”
What CyCognito has set out to do is outflank attackers and one of the results is a high-definition snapshot of the threat landscape, on any given day. That’s a major step forward. I hope they are able to trigger a new era of advances in the overall field of attack surface monitoring.
Meanwhile, as you might expect, the company has also designed its botnet and analytics platform to be available for hire — to drill down on individual companies’ IT assets. This can help companies identify and address open attack vectors — before the bad guys can get to them. “We looked to create a new class of solution to beat the attackers at their own game,” Gurzeev says. “It’s heartening that from Day One on our platform, customers are finding, assessing and closing open pathways.”
I expect layered defenses will continue to have a place, moving forward. But it’s going to be fascinating to see how adding a bit of offensive punch to defending networks catches on, and how much of a difference offensive security solutions will make, overall. I’ll keep watching.
Pulitzer Prize-winning business journalist Byron V. Acohido is dedicated to fostering public awareness about how to make the Internet as private and secure as it ought to be.
(LW provides consulting services to the vendors we cover.)
*** This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog from The Last Watchdog authored by bacohido. Read the original post at: https://www.lastwatchdog.com/new-tech-cycognito-deploys-offensive-bot-network-to-put-companies-a-step-a-head-of-attackers/
View full post on National Cyber Security
#deepweb | Google’s New Messaging App To Unify Gmail, Drive, And Hangouts…And Other Small Business Tech News
Source: National Cyber Security – Produced By Gregory Evans KRAKOW, POLAND – 2019/01/23: In this photo illustration, the Google Hangouts logo is seen displayed … [+] on an Android mobile phone. (Photo Illustration by Omar Marques/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) LightRocket via Getty Images Here are five things in technology that happened this past week […] View full post on AmIHackerProof.com
Source: National Cyber Security – Produced By Gregory Evans For years, financial technology (fintech) companies have used screen-scraping to retrieve customers’ financial data with their consent. Think lenders, financial management apps, personal finance dashboards, and accounting products doing useful things: like, say, your budgeting app will use screen-scraping to get at the incoming and outgoing […] View full post on AmIHackerProof.com
The United States Congress made some significant progress this session when it comes to data privacy, but cybersecurity remains a blind spot for lawmakers.
Congress currently is considering a
national privacy law that mirrors legislation enacted in the European Union. It would allow people to access, correct and request the deletion of the personal information collected from them. Though there are several ideas as to the final form the bill should take, a path became clear during the Senate Commerce Committee’s
privacy hearing last month.
Congress also seems willing to address the consequences of new technologies. Last month it passed the National Quantum Initiative Act, which is expected to disperse US$1.275 billion for quantum research over the next four years. Some have argued that this newfound enthusiasm for tech might be used
to fix the impeachment process.
When it comes to cybersecurity, though, Congress is still in the dark ages. Efforts to pass a privacy law often are seen as addressing both data privacy and cybersecurity, but in reality, they do not. Companies and consumers have been forced to take matters into their own hands, reflected in the recent announcement that Facebook
has banned deepfakes, and the rising use of VPNs among the general population.
Privacy Means Nothing Without Security
This oversight with respect to security could have huge consequences for the efficacy of data privacy legislation. Though data privacy and data security are separate concerns, there is an inherent link between them. Security has been overlooked in the current proposed law, as well as in similar legislation — like Europe’s GDPR and the Australian privacy bill
passed two years ago.
To understand how privacy and security are linked, consider an app that collects location data from its users. The types of data privacy law proposed (or already in force) would impose strict requirements on the company behind this app, such as telling its users what it is collecting, and what it does with the data. If the app is not properly secured, however, and the information is stolen or leaked, strong privacy policies will be of little comfort to users.
This oversight is apparent in almost all the legislation on data privacy in the U.S. The
Information Transparency & Personal Data Control Act, which was introduced in the House last spring, contains a passage that requires lawmakers and tech companies “to protect consumers from bad actors in the privacy and security space,” but it doesn’t include any further details. The
Consumer Online Privacy Rights Act goes a little further, but only two of its 59 pages give vague cybersecurity requirements for private companies.
United States Consumer Data Privacy Act of 2019 provides only the broad instruction that companies should “maintain reasonable administrative, technical, and physical data security policies and practices to protect against risks to the confidentiality, security, and integrity of sensitive covered data.”
A Lack of Leadership
At best, the failure of Congress to tackle cybersecurity has left the data of millions of Americans unprotected. At worst, it represents a lack of leadership that has left responsible companies completely confused as to what their legal, moral and ethical responsibilities are when it comes to protecting user data.
In this context, there has grown a huge and unregulated market for cybersecurity tools and services, each claiming to offer class-leading protection against cybercrime. For companies, website security is now a major component of
website maintenance costs. This is because CEOs are acutely aware of the risks of cybercrime, a form of criminality that
will cost the global economy $6 trillion a year by 2021, according to Cybersecurity Ventures’ annual report.
Even the National Security Agency
has warned that cybercriminals are “becoming more sophisticated and capable every day in their ability to use the Internet for nefarious purposes.” Yet many companies
fail to take basic precautions, such as deleting expired accounts.
To be fair to Congress, crafting a data security law that covers every private company is complex. Today, data is unlikely to be held by one company in one place, and assigning responsibility for protecting it has become a difficult issue. Any such law, therefore, would have to take into account the widespread adoption of cloud storage,
SaaS business models, and other forms of distributed data storage and processing. In this context, it’s understandable that most
state-level laws on data security require companies only to take “reasonable” security practices, without specifying what those are.
On the other hand, there finally does appear to be an appetite in Congress to address these issues. An increasing number of data protection laws cover individual industries, such as
financial institutions, and the FTC has brought some data breach-related
enforcement actions under its relatively weak and vague
consumer protection powers.
Looking to the future, these industry-specific laws could form an excellent model for a national data protection law, as could state-level legislation. The state most mentioned in this regard is New York, which arguably has the most comprehensive requirements. Financial services companies in the state must meet more than 10
specific requirements, which include encryption of nonpublic information, penetration testing, vulnerability assessments, and oversight of service providers’ cybersecurity.
New York also offers another lesson for Congress. In order to draft and enact the new law, the state convened an expert panel that brought together lawmakers, cybersecurity professionals, and the CEOs of major companies.
The development of an effective data protection law at a national level is going to require the same level of expertise and consultation. This is why some have suggested that a
federal Department of Cybersecurity is the way forward. Such a department could bring together responsibilities that currently are fragmented across a huge number of departments.
Lacking even a basic indication from the government as to what constitutes adequate cybersecurity, many people are taking cybersecurity into their own hands. VPNs — security tools that encrypt user data in transit — are experiencing explosive growth. Just a few years ago, they were regarded as semi-legal tools that enabled consumers
to get around Netflix geo-blocks or
avoid cryptocurrency bans. Now, they are used by a significant proportion of the populace.
Whatever the outcome of these new legislative initiatives, data protection is no longer an issue that Congress can ignore. Protecting consumer data is important for the economy. At the broadest level, ensuring data security is also critical to the efficacy of data privacy legislation that already has been passed. That is to say nothing of the reputation of Congress, which would be severely damaged if it should fail to take leadership on one of the most important issues facing the U.S. today.
The post #nationalcybersecuritymonth | Is Congress Finally Ready to Take On Cybersecurity? | Tech Law appeared first on National Cyber Security.
View full post on National Cyber Security
Source: National Cyber Security – Produced By Gregory Evans In terms of technology, the world had been unifying for years. Now it is reverting back to the likes of the VHS-versus-Betamax era, with much bigger consequences. Imagine two countries with completely different sets of hardware and software for the internet, electronic devices, telecommunications, and even […] View full post on AmIHackerProof.com
Should big tech be broken up? That question was raised at CES this week following months of discussion and antitrust inquiries from lawmakers and regulators in Washington.
The subject of both a tech think tank panel and a Federal Trade Commission-focused panel at CES this week is timely given ongoing investigations by the Department of Justice and the FTC into anti-competitive behavior of companies including Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple. The House Judiciary Committee is also conducting its own tech antitrust probe.
Robert Atkinson, president of the think tank Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, said in a panel yesterday he was against the idea of a break-up. “The simple fact that big technology companies are big, is not a problem in itself, in fact it’s a benefit,” he said. Atkinson said large tech companies, such as Alphabet and Amazon, are among the top investors in research and development in the world and without their size, they couldn’t innovate.
His remarks mirrored those of Christine Wilson, a commissioner at the Federal Trade Commission, who said in an earlier FTC session that proposals from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and others to break up large, successful companies because they are large and successful “is not an approach that I would embrace.”
FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter defended the intent behind some of the break-up proposals. “What they are doing is saying that we are concerned about the effects across the market, and in the market, and on consumers, of the market power that particularly large companies have, and how they are using that market power,” Slaughter said during the FTC session. “So it may be that either more regulation or breaking up is an appropriate way to remedy those concerns.”
Charlotte Slaiman, senior policy counsel at non-profit Public Knowledge, also raised the alarms over big tech’s dominance. “I am very concerned about the power of big tech, which I define as dominant digital platforms,” she said in yesterday’s panel. She did agree that antitrust laws are not necessarily well-suited to address the network effects that have led to big tech’s growth, but said new laws are needed to remedy consumer harms that are the result from dominant tech, including a federal privacy bill.
She also contested Atkinson’s premise that tech companies’ large R&D spending is the best way to measure innovation. A small company that is trying to gain market share is going to do much more disruptive innovation, she said. “A company that is already doing well, that is very comfortable in its market position, is going to do some innovation on the margins,” she said. But if a large companies discovers a great innovation that could potentially limit their market power, they might want to sit on that versus innovate, she added.
Sen. Rosen Talks STEM Bill, Tech Innovation: Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.) wasn’t able to make it to CES in Las Vegas this week due to the Senate schedule, but in a phone interview praised the state’s tech sector and highlighted STEM and tech legislation she’s pushing in Congress.
“I’m proud that Nevada is leading the nation in innovation and software job growth,” Rosen told Bloomberg Government. “I will continue to support legislation, like my bipartisan Building Blocks of STEM that was recently signed into law, to ensure that the Silver State is educating and training the workforce of tomorrow.”
Rosen and Victoria Espinel, president and CEO of BSA The Software Alliance, co-authored an opinion article yesterday in the Las Vegas Sun noting that Nevada has the fastest growing software job sector in the country.
Rosen’s bill (S. 737), signed into law by President Donald Trump late last year, expands STEM education initiatives at the National Science Foundation for young children and creates new research grants to increase the participation of girls in computer science.
She also highlighted her bipartisan Mapping to Save Moms’ Lives Act (S. 3152), which she released this week. That measure would require the Federal Communications Commission to map remote areas with internet service gaps and high rates of poor maternal health outcomes.
“In Nevada we have real frontier land, particularly in northern Nevada,” she said. “We know about 5G, we have places with no ‘G,’ We have to get everybody connected.”
She said she is working on legislation with Girls Who Code, a nonprofit that trains girls in computer coding, to require schools that receive federal funding for computer science programs to provide information on demographics in the classroom. “So many school districts say, ‘We have computer science education.’ But are we sure that we’re making it accessible, available and open or recruiting everybody to do that or just a select group,” she said.
Rosen has experience with technology, having worked as a computer programmer and software developer for numerous companies in Nevada, including Summa Corporation, Citibank, and Southwest Gas.
Happening on the Hill
Legislation & Letters:
- House Lawmakers Unveil Bill to Revamp Children’s Privacy Law: A bipartisan House bill announced yesterday aims to modernize children’s privacy laws by raising the age of parental consent and protecting the geolocation and biometric data of minors. The measure, introduced by Republican Rep. Tim Walberg (Mich.) and Democratic Rep. Bobby Rush (Ill.), would update the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998, known as COPPA. The bill would raise age of parental consent protections for children from age 13 to 16, and affirm the law applies to children’s privacy on mobile apps. Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Ed Markey (D-Mass.) introduced a similar bill to update COPPA in the Senate last March. See the House bill text here.
- Wyden, Others Ping FCC on Wireless Scams: Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and five House and Senate members yesterday asked the FCC to protect consumers from scammers hijacking phone numbers to steal bank and other personal information. “As the primary regulator of the wireless industry, the FCC has the responsibility and authority to secure America’s communication networks and protect consumers who rely on those networks. To that end, we urge the FCC to initiate a rulemaking to protect consumers from SIM swaps, port outs and other similar methods of account fraud,” the members wrote.
Happening Next Week:
- Facial Recognition: The House Oversight and Reform Committee on Wednesday holds the third installment in a series of hearings on facial recognition, focusing on “ensuring commercial transparency and accuracy.”
- Future Industries: The Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee plans a hearing Wednesday on industries of the future. Witnesses include National Institute of Standards and Technology Director Walter Copan, National Science Foundation Director France Cordova, U.S. Chief Technology Officer Michael Kratsios, and FCC Commissioners Jessica Rosenworcel and Michael O’Rielly.
Industry and Regulation
Business Group Chief Urges Congress to Step Up on Privacy, Labor: Congress should move past gridlock and take the reins on issues such as privacy, where liberal states have enacted new laws, the leader of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce plans to say in a Thursday speech. “Washington’s inability to make progress on data privacy is resulting in a patchwork of state rules and regulations that will stifle the free flow of goods and services across state borders,” chamber Chief Executive Officer Tom Donohue said in prepared remarks.
As part of his annual “State of American Business” address, Donohue expressed worry about state-by-state approaches, particularly regarding data protection and worker classification in the gig economy, according to excerpts provided by the chamber, one of the most influential and highest-spending business associations in Washington. Read more from Ben Brody.
Apple Stole Tech for Watch, Masimo Claims: Apple is accused of stealing trade secrets and improperly using Masimo inventions related to health monitoring in its Apple Watch. Masimo, which develops signal processing technology for health-care monitors, and its spinoff, Cercacor Laboratories, claim in a lawsuit that Apple got secret information under the guise of a working relationship and then hired away key employees, including Michael O’Reilly, who became vice president of Apple’s health technology efforts. The business segment that includes the Apple Watch, Apple TV and Beats headphones is the company’s fastest-growing category and generated more than $24 billion in sales in the fiscal year that ended in September. Read more from Susan Decker and Mark Gurman.
New DHS Cybersecurity Assistant Director Starts: Bryan Ware earlier this week stepped into a top cyber role at Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency that was vacated by longtime assistant director Jeanette Manfra, according to a statement yesterday. Ware steps into the position just as the U.S. faces potential Iranian cyber attacks following its assassination of a top general. Sam Kaplan will fill Ware’s former position at the department later this month, Michaela Ross reports.
To contact the reporters on this story: Rebecca Kern in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org; Giuseppe Macri in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Zachary Sherwood at firstname.lastname@example.org; Brandon Lee at email@example.com
The post #nationalcybersecuritymonth | TECH & CYBER BRIEFING: CES Debates Breaking Up Big Tech appeared first on National Cyber Security.
View full post on National Cyber Security